Energiatulevaisuus ei ole musta

Kirjoituksen kirjoitin ensin kommentiksi, mutta tuo blogi olikin ennakkomoderoitu, eikä kirjoitus luultavasti koskaan tulisi julkaistuksi.
Laitin tuon sitten ylle, hieman muokattuna kylläkin.

Vaikka kylmäfuusioilmiöiden tieteellistä taustaa ei olekaan selvitetty vielä täydellisesti, ei energiantuotannon havaintoja kuitenkaan voida jättää huomiotta pelkän hyväksytyn teorian puutteen vuoksi.

http://oilprice.com/Finance/investing-and-trading-...

Yo. sivusto ottaa kantaa myös LENR-reaktioiden vaikutukseen sijoittajamarkkinoilla, ja seuraa tilannetta. Hyvä tietolähde.

vielä lainaus sivulta:
"The real reason for the relatively low range bound price of crude for the last two years, is simply huge short selling and anti-trend trading by the big financial institutions (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, etc.). The reasons for this might be a political agenda executed by these ”swap dealers” to keep the price in a certain range for macroeconomic growth reasons, or maybe, which is the hypothesis of this report, they know something that is not yet publicly accepted. LENR might already be a technological fact on the industrial scale, and not further away in time than the banks can manage to keep it secret. This makes a huge difference on the outcome. Maybe this is exactly what they know. It certainly would not be surprising if they have verified the E-Cat and actively trade on that information. The information advantage is huge and so are the potential profits.

By. Torkel Nyberg"

Kannattaa ehkä myös panna merkille, että en ole maailman ainoa LENR-reaktioiden olemassaolon tiedostamiseksi kirjoitteleva,
Italiassa, josta kylmäfuusion uusi tutkiminen on oikeastaan lähtenyt, on esitetty Google-kääntäjän mukaan seuraavaa:

"Kysymys Kirjallisesti vastattava 4-03785
by
Ivan laaksoon
teksti
Perjantai 16 toukokuu 2014, istunto ei. 230
VALLEY , DE LORENZIS , Massimiliano BERNINI , Liuzzi , Petraroli , DE ROSA , MANLIO DI STEFANO , Luigi DI MAIO . - Opetusministeri yliopiston ja tutkimus. - Jos haluat tietää - koska:
alalla LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaktiot, Low-ydinreaktiot) on erittäin kiinnostava kansainvälisellä tasolla ja tutkimuksen laajuuteen monissa laboratorioissa ympäri maailmaa;
Italia on, Japanin ja Yhdysvaltojen kesken maissa vuodesta luvun alussa ovat tutkineet tällaista tutkimusta, kautta kansallisten toimivaltaisten tutkimuslaitosten;
Eri ryhmät ovat nyt aktiivisia Italian yliopistoissa, ENEA ja INFN edistää teoreettisen ja kokeellisen tutkimuksen matalan ydinreaktiot;
ydinreaktioita vähän virtaa ilmiöitä ei yleisesti tunnettuja eivätkä kaikki parametrit, joilla voidaan varmistaa toistettavuus on tunnistettu tähän mennessä ja täysin ymmärretä;
monia parannuksia on tehty tieteellisissä julkaisuissa viime vuosina tutkimukseen LENR;
joitakin patentteja on jo myönnetty;
julkistettiin laitteita tuotetaan energiaa ilmiöiden LENR valmis markkinoille;
kerran osoittanut olemassaolon LENR johtaisi järkyttävä uudelleenmäärittely ydinfysiikan;
Italia voisi olla keskeinen rooli, koska sen historia, tällä tutkimusalalla -:
mitkä ovat sen suuntaviivoja toimintaa koskevaa kansainvälistä tutkimusta LENR ja siksi kiinnostus yliopistojen ja yritysten todellisuuteen;
jos se katsoo sen aiheelliseksi ryhtyä toimiin varaamaan riittävästi varoja parhaillaan käynnissä olevien yliopistojen ja julkisten tutkimuslaitosten alalla LENR Italian;
aikooko se edistää uutta tutkimusta alalla LENR. (4-03785)"

http://banchedati.camera.it/sindacatoispettivo_17/...

Pakkoruotsin syötyä kielenoppimisaikaani en osaa kunnolla italiaa, kielellisesti lahjakkaammat olkaa hyvät.

Linkkaan tähän vielä muistiin hoksaamani kysymyksen ministerille tuolla Italiassa. Hieman hankalaa etsiä ilman kielenosaamista, mutta onnistuinpa:

linkki ensin, sitten googlen käännös englanniksi, se tuntuu järkevämmältä kuin suomeen käännös.

http://banchedati.camera.it/sindacatoispettivo_17/

käännös tässä:
"GIROTTO, SERRA, MOUTHPIECE - The Minister of Education, University and Research - Given that:

from about 25 years conducting experiments with the electrolytic cell Fleischmann and Pons or reactors based on transition metals (eg in Italy the reactor titanium-deuterium Scaramuzzi, the nickel-hydrogen reactor Piantelli-Focardi, the reactor the constantan, copper-nickel alloy, Celani) in which has been detected a production of excess heat with very high power density, higher orders of magnitude to those of ordinary chemical reactions, including explosive, then of great potential for applications energy;

the high power density was announced, the first discoverers, have identified what was happening in the cell fusion reactions at room temperature, "cold fusion" (FF). This affirmation is in total contrast with the knowledge acquired and shared in the scientific world: the American Physical Society (in its conference in Baltimore on 1 May 1989), after only twenty days from the publication of the article by Fleischmann, Pons Hawkins and the Journal of Electroanalytical chemistry, declared the discovery of Fleischman and Pons a mere pretense, and within two years, the "cold fusion" was branded as "pathological science" from the academic world;

had actively contributed to the conviction itself and the academic world with the rejection by the scientific journal articles on FF, complained as early as 1990 Nobel laureate Julian Schwinger, and at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) with active campaigns of vilification and falsification data in favor of "hot fusion", as he testified in his 1991 book Eugene Mallove, editor in chief science at MIT;

in the opinion of the questioners hostility to the FF, as well as for his inexplicable in the context of shared theories, has persisted over the years mainly for the following reasons: the difficulties in the reproducibility of the experiments; the well-established trend in the world of physics to want to legitimize what is to be considered science, attitude undoubtedly pre-Galilean but functional, and with success, to direct substantial public investment on designated channels (only one example among many: it is the questioners that amounts to more than € 7 billion cost of the experiment on the Higgs boson); a tendency of the military to conceal the CF experiments with secrecy for reasons related to innovation in nuclear weapons (for example, appears only in 2002 the ratio of the Navy on experiments conducted in their labs in the period 1989-2002, almost all with production of significant "anomalies" heat and helium);

considered that:

the experiment cited by proponents of the FF as evidence of the character of the fusion reaction at room temperature - the replica in 1998 at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) of the experiment known as "M4", produced by M. McKubre and others in the 1994 always at SRI - while it confirms the excess of high density energy in the form of heat and the simultaneous production of helium, is, paradoxically, an experimental test that the reaction in the electrolytic cell can not be a fusion reaction at room temperature , with what postulating the need for a different theory;

the new theory advanced in recent years by A. Widom, L. Larsen and Y. Srivastava (WLS) to interpret various phenomena, among which the excess thermal power detected in cell Pons and Fleischmann and in many other similar experiments, experiment "M4" included, reject cold fusion as a possible mechanism and refers instead to low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR - low energy nuclear reactions) made ​​possible by the mediation of the electromagnetic field. The theory WLS arises within that for the electroweak interactions provides the "standard model", universally accepted by physics;

in the opinion of the questioners new point of view has brought back this very long story, here in Italy, and just in the past few months, within a scientific debate, although on different locations, including researchers such as Luciano Maiani and the founders of the new theory, Widom and Srivastava, affected only a short time before by ridiculous "dumbfounded" by advocates more aggressively silly of an alleged scientific orthodoxy;

considered that:

the LENR can not really be junk science, as has been stated, however unfairly for the FF of Fleischmann and Pons, but provide an interpretation of the nuclear reactions within the standard model, and not a new physics according to the hypothesis advanced by some supporters of the FF;

the production of excess heat is carried out, as explained by the theory WLS does not emit rays or neutrons? and therefore constitutes a source of clean energy - renewable, if the electricity needed is produced from renewable sources - in limited volumes, ideal for satisfying consumers than domestic ones in hospitals, shopping centers and small and medium industries, providing a concrete response to the imperative, even very recently reiterated Intergovernamental panel on climate change (IPCC) on the occasion of the presentation of his fifth report, to replace more and more fossil fuels ultimately responsible for the dramatic urgency of climate change;

from the experimental point of view LENR devices are the subject of great interest in various advanced countries, as for example evidenced in terms decidedly positive a chief scientist of NASA, Dennis Bushnell, the site NASA technology gateway (which, in addition to the transfer of technology , qualifies as "A place to purchase LENR technology"). Even Toyota, which in its French laboratory IMRA had invested £ 12 million in 1991-1998 in a contract with Fleischmann and Pons, today excels in research on nano-Ni-Cu alloys (nickel-copper);

in our country have continued in recent years with the National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, in collaboration with SRI International and the University "La Sapienza", research on the strand Fleischmann and Pons;

in relation to an experiment similar to that of Toyota and home of the University of Kobe, but in a completely independent manner, taking place for some time at the Frascati National Laboratories (LNF) of the National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN) research Francesco Celani and his team, whose promising results have been shown a few weeks ago during a conference organized by the CIRPS (Interuniversity research Centre for Sustainable Development), "La Sapienza";

a design company technology Low energy nuclear reactions, predicted that the commercialization of its devices will have a goal of two years, but that the final result will depend largely by the industries that want to produce such devices;

turns out to questioners that the INFN intends to stop funding the research carried out by Professor Celani at Frascati National Laboratories (LNF) and has communicated the same Celani to rid the laboratory where for decades conducts his experiments,

asks to know:

if the Minister considers it necessary to address not intervene in relation to the feared closure, decided by the president of the INFN and ottemperata by the Director of the INFN LNF, the laboratory where the testing takes place Celani and his team because, in the opinion the questioners, it appears paradoxical that in the context described in the introduction is considered devoid of current interest in a direct search with recognized levels of excellence, Francesco Celani, first INFN researcher and vice-president of the International society of condensed matter nuclear science, which for over twenty years working in the field of LENR, just as his trial on constantan, an alloy of nickel and copper has been known since the late nineteenth century, opens horizons applications with low cost materials;

if you do not intend to promote research on LENR in institutions and organizations in the Italian research and applied research, in view of the significant energy applications possible in the short to medium term in the context of the scenarios to mitigate the effects of climate change;

if it finds that such public investment in research have lower costs specified above, at least three orders of magnitude, compared to those with which Italy supports large projects for the "hot fusion" (ITER), and considering that in energy field, in the opinion of the questioners, is an illusion but harmful historic believe that there can be a single energy source can solve most of the problems of requirements, in particular noting that the search is initiated by some 60 years and, far from talking about marketing, predictions of an industrial prototype for the fusion refer to 2030.

(3-00406)"

Että on sitä kiinnostusta muuallakin, ehkä kannattaisi täälläkin heräillä.

Tiivistetysti:
Italiassa tehdään parlamenttikyselyjä LENR- reaktioiden tutkimuksesta,
no meillä aiheesta ei eduskunta ole kuullutkaan,
nevöhööd.

Kirjataanpa tämäkin viimevuoden (siis vanha) juttu suoraan Brysselistä tänne muistiin, vaikei näitä vanhoja kirjoituksia taida kukaan lukea.
Lainaus sivulta:
(FPE tässä tarkoittaa kylmäfuusiota)

"European Parliament – Brussels, 3 June 2013

The scope of the workshop was to make the European community aware of the "state-of-the-art" of the studies on the Fleischmann-Pons Effect (FPE) phenomenon.
This effect is the appearance of excess energy when a Pd cathode is electrolyzed in heavy water.
Energy densities measured during FPE are orders of magnitude larger than the maximum energy associated to any known chemical process."

http://www.enea.it/it/Ufficio-Bruxelles/news/new-a...

Tiivistetysti, kyllä tietoa tiedonhaluisille on ollut olemassa jopa EU:n ytimessä asti.